Explore our comprehensive collection of pharmacoepidemiology resources
Explore our in-depth articles and practical guides covering various aspects of pharmacoepidemiology methodologies, data sources, regulatory aspects, and more.
A comprehensive guide to selecting appropriate study designs for addressing specific research questions in drug safety and effectiveness research.
Read ArticleAn exploration of modern approaches to addressing confounding bias in pharmacoepidemiological research, including propensity score methods, disease risk scores, and instrumental variables.
Read ArticleA practical guide to understanding, accessing, and analyzing administrative healthcare claims data for drug safety and utilization studies.
Read ArticleAn overview of current regulatory expectations for post-authorization safety studies in major markets, including study protocols, reporting requirements, and good pharmacovigilance practices.
Read ArticleAn examination of how real-world evidence is being integrated into regulatory frameworks for both pre- and post-approval drug evaluation, with case studies and best practices.
Read ArticleA technical guide to linking electronic health record data with other health information for comprehensive pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Read ArticleStay informed about significant recent studies and publications in pharmacoepidemiology, with expert summaries and commentary on their implications.
This multinational cohort study of over 35,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients found no significant association between prior ACE inhibitor or ARB use and increased risk of death or severe outcomes, after robust adjustment for confounding factors. The study employed multiple sensitivity analyses and advanced confounding control methods.
The researchers utilized a distributed network approach across 11 countries, with a common data model and analysis plan. This approach allowed for both country-specific and pooled analyses while addressing data privacy concerns.
These findings provide reassurance regarding the continued use of these medications during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating how pharmacoepidemiological research can rapidly address emerging clinical questions of public health importance.
Read Full SummaryThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the validity of cancer diagnoses in administrative claims data across 47 validation studies. Positive predictive values varied by cancer type (ranging from 65% to 93%) and were highest when algorithms incorporated multiple claims and specific diagnostic codes.
The authors developed a quality assessment framework for validation studies and provided cancer-specific recommendations for case-finding algorithms in claims data.
This work provides essential guidance for researchers using claims data for cancer pharmacoepidemiology studies, highlighting the importance of validated outcome definitions in observational research.
Read Full SummaryIn this large cohort study using U.S. claims data, significant differences in cardiovascular outcomes were observed between individual GLP-1 receptor agonists in routine clinical practice, with semaglutide associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to other agents in the class.
The study employed an active comparator new-user design with high-dimensional propensity score adjustment to minimize confounding, demonstrating advanced methods for comparing treatments within the same therapeutic class.
These findings provide real-world evidence to complement clinical trial data on the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, potentially informing treatment selection in clinical practice.
Read Full SummaryA comprehensive glossary of key terms and concepts in pharmacoepidemiology and related fields, designed to support both newcomers and experienced professionals.
A study design that compares patients who are new users of one medication with patients who are new users of an alternative medication for the same indication. This approach aims to reduce confounding by indication and other biases associated with prevalent user designs.
A response to a medicinal product that is noxious and unintended, occurring at doses normally used in humans for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the restoration, correction, or modification of physiological function.
Healthcare data generated through the billing process for medical services, hospitalizations, procedures, and prescription drugs. These data are primarily collected for reimbursement purposes but are widely used in pharmacoepidemiological research.
A systematic error in the design, conduct, or analysis of a study that results in a mistaken estimate of an exposure's effect on the risk of disease. Common types in pharmacoepidemiology include selection bias, information bias, and confounding.
The consistency of an observed association with existing biological and medical knowledge. In pharmacoepidemiology, this refers to whether an observed drug-outcome association is consistent with known pharmacological mechanisms.
A study design in which each case serves as its own control. Exposure frequency during a time period immediately before the outcome event (case period) is compared with exposure frequency during one or more control periods for the same individual.
A form of allocation bias that occurs when drugs with similar therapeutic indications are prescribed to groups of patients with different prognostic characteristics, based on factors such as disease severity, comorbidities, or perceived risk of adverse events.
A type of confounding that occurs when the clinical indication for selecting a particular treatment also affects the outcome being studied, independently of the treatment effect. This is one of the most important sources of bias in observational studies of treatment effects.
A curated collection of high-quality external resources including journals, databases, organizations, and tools relevant to pharmacoepidemiology research and practice.
The official journal of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology, publishing original research, reviews, and methodological papers on the effects and uses of medicines in populations.
Visit WebsiteA journal focusing on promoting the safe and proper use of medicines through the publication of high-quality research on pharmacovigilance and medication errors.
Visit WebsiteThe official journal of ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research), publishing research on pharmacoeconomics, health outcomes, and comparative effectiveness research.
Visit WebsiteA global professional organization dedicated to advancing the health of the public by providing a forum for the exchange of scientific and educational information among members and by promoting pharmacoepidemiology.
Visit WebsiteAn international non-governmental organization that publishes influential guidelines on pharmacovigilance and drug safety, including the classification and reporting of adverse drug reactions.
Visit WebsiteA FDA-led program that uses electronic healthcare data to monitor the safety of FDA-regulated medical products, including drugs, biologics, and medical devices.
Visit WebsiteA multi-stakeholder, interdisciplinary collaborative that brings out the value of health data through large-scale analytics using a common data model and standardized analytics tools.
Visit WebsiteA distributed network of Canadian researchers and data centers that uses administrative health care data to provide rapid answers to questions about drug safety and effectiveness.
Visit WebsiteA European initiative that aims to design, develop, and validate a computerized system for detecting adverse drug reactions, using electronic healthcare records from several European countries.
Visit WebsiteA set of measures drawn up by the European Medicines Agency to facilitate the performance of pharmacovigilance activities in the European Union.
Visit WebsiteGuidance documents from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on using real-world evidence to support regulatory decision-making for drugs and biologics.
Visit Website